Saturday, December 30, 2006

A sermonic bit to end the year.

It comes as a surprise to some people that Jesus was never a Christian.  He was a Jew.  Always.  Luke’s Gospel, although probably written with a focus for those who were not Jewish, makes sure we understand right from the beginning that Jesus of Nazareth was truly Jewish.  We actually know remarkably little about Jesus.  Countless books have been written but when we get right down to it, all we know of this figure of religious significance is found in a few verses of the Gospels.  Today, we find Luke doing some gap-filling.  Quite possibly this is a huge feat of Luke’s imagination, but even if it is, we are in no doubt about Luke’s purpose – to set the life of Jesus firmly within a Jewish context.

His parents do everything the Law demanded of them, and more.  Instead of ensuring they went to Jerusalem for Passover once in their lifetime, they went every year.  In the context of this sacred festival, central to being Jewish, Luke creates a picture of a 12 year old boy debating with the sages as if he is some sort of tribal child prodigy.  They lose him for a while, then find him on the third day of looking, in the Temple, listening and asking questions, and all who heard his answers were amazed.

Here is language we will hear again and again throughout the Gospels – people are amazed around Jesus.  It’s the writer’s way of establishing that in this person called Jesus of Nazareth, something remarkable is going on.  Later the something remarkable establishes itself in the death and resurrection stories which are the foundation for the belief in Jesus that became the church. But that’s a long way off in Luke’s narrative.  Right now, he wants the reader to know that Jesus didn’t burst onto the scene and then sort his life out, but there was always something special about the kid from the sticks.

It’s important for us to understand that the Gospels are not biography written for 21st Century followers of Jesus.  They’re documents of their time, containing some authentic biographical details which link Jesus with his time, but also they make continuous comment of a theological nature on who they believe Jesus is.  Special, this kid, watch him grow in favour with all people and with God, writes Luke.  Now then follow his ways all the way to God.  Such is the theological commentary in a nutshell.  Luke is not concerned with our concerns – he doesn’t care what side of his head Jesus parted his hair, or how come he walked with a limp, or whether he rode a donkey, threw stones at the local rabbi, or any other thing that would make the childhood of Jesus interesting to us.  No, Luke creates a story of Jesus as God’s special one, not for his own sake, but to give a lead to others to follow.

 

For us, this reading comes at the cusp of a new year.  We’re about to change our calendars, throw away the old diary, make hogmanay and new years resolutions.  The last day of the year has always had its own significance – it is a day of pondering, looking back and looking forward at the same time.  What we each remember of the past year is determined by what we each experienced.  We tend to remember the extreme peaks and troughs of life – the traumas or the highs.  We may remember these things connected to weather – the great snowfall, or to family circumstance – the time when Sarah broke her arm.  We may also remember the year in interior ways – insights or thoughts that have helped us become better people, or to make important changes.  It might be a year when we have some community insights too.  The changing of the year is a time to reflect.  Because it comes just after Christmas, and we’re in the summer rush, for us this time of reflection can easily slip past and hardly happen.

There is an old church tradition of seeing out the old year and seeing in the new in worship.  It’s called the Watchnight service.  No, tonight we won’t be here at midnight.  It’s tradition is focussed on thinking back and looking forward.  Thinking back over the past year and making our repentance for the things we’ve done that need to be different.  Looking ahead in hope and anticipation that God will walk our way with us.

 

The tearing down of last year’s calendar is something of a sacred act.  With it goes all the activity of last year.  Similarly putting up the new one is a sacred act of trust and hope.  And in between is a time of pondering, reflecting, and wondering.  Rituals such as calendar changing are a good time to stop for a moment.  No it’s not questioning in the temple time, but it is a chance to remember that we are choosing to follow the Way of the one whose childhood is depicted as being immersed in the religious and spiritual life of his parents.  It’s a chance to ask ourselves how our immersion into the Way makes a difference to who we are and the ways we live.  Or then again, we could just throw the old one out and put up the new.  But I hope not!

Posted by in 10:02:27 | Permalink | No Comments »

Friday, December 22, 2006

Christmas!

I’ve been wondering what tosay during my advent reflections at St Ninians.  So I’ve said little in some ways.  Using the traditional themes of love, joy, hope, and peace gives a structure to pondering what’s going on as we apprioach yet another Christmas with the usual rush of cynicism and delight.  I’ve noticed that bashing Christmas has become a popular journalistic enterprise yet again.  I wonder how many people actually think the virgin birth is the basis of their faith.  It certainly is not for me, nor has it ever been.  Today’s Christchurch Press proudly prints an article where the writer trumpets that maybe the whole faith is based on a mistranslation of “virgin” which should have been “maiden”.  Good for the writer – but that’s such an old piece of news!! 

Christmas is a time of reflection for me – on the way I understand God at work.  It’s coming down to  fewer and fewer words – but at the baseline is the old word compassion – our ability to suffer with another.  Without it, love has no meaning and Christianity is relegated to a belief in ideas.  Compassion is not limited to any particular faith, but it’s such a basic human value that identifies our humanity at its best.  For me, it’s one place to begin an exploration of Emmanuel – God with us.  Is compassion present or absent in the way we are in the world? 

 

Well, that’s it for me for a week or two.  I’ll be back next year, out and about.  Thanks to those of you who read this stuff – I’m amazed at how people get to find it in the ether, and some even comment.  I appreciate such feedback.

 

arohanui  Rob 

Posted by in 23:29:08 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

feet

It’s funny how walking can change my perspective on the neighbourhood.  It doesn’t even have to be a long walk – a few hundred metres to the dairy did it today – I met all sorts of people who live around here.  Two women were out tidying up the garden plot – they have a different sort of garden from mine – they have lots of little plants that remind me of the remnants of a bring and buy sale – bits poked in where there’s a bare patch of dirt, with no scheme other than to see if it will grow.  These gardens will never make it into the magazines and never win prizes for minimalist design, or any other design – which is the point.  These gardens simply are there defying description.  One has lots of rocks and old stakes that no longer hold anything up, apart from the bits of string flapping in the wind to remind me that once something got up to a reasonable height here.  I don’t find these gardens restful, but I do find them interesting.  One of the gardeners was scraping up bits of stuff to poke into her rubbish bag – collection day today.  The other was struggling to fit the sprinkler head onto the hose.  Neither took any notice of me.  The bus stop was occupied by 5 people too – none of whom took any notice of me either.  I wondered idly what I’d have to do – shout something maybe, or bump into one of the early morning commuters perhaps.  The dairy man was different – of course he’s paid to notice me.  I pay him for the privilege of conversation – we talk about the weather all year.  Short snippets of conversation mind.  I’m only there for milk or cell phone top up.  I blame him for the bad weather in winter and he grins, and then makes up a wild story about how many more days of crap we’ll get.  Today it was very hot, even at 8am.  I congratulated him on giving me such a beautiful day.  He grinned.  Perhaps he doesn’t want to be known as god.  But at least he takes notice of me, paid to do it or not.  And he doesn’t even know my name or anything else about me.  I doubt if he’ll read this, but I think he deserves to be famous – the weather god who hides in the dairy, and talks through a grin.  Brilliant.  Like the weather he gave me today.
Posted by in 09:16:15 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Tuesday, December 5, 2006

Memory – past and present!

Last week I was giving a presentation on “The future shape of Ministry” – the topic I was given.  I found I needed to spend some time exploring something of my understanding of the future shape of church in order to understand the ministry bit.  I won’t go into all that right now, except to allude to a particular struggle one participant was having with where I was headed.  I suggested that the core of being church in whatever form is the memory of Jesus.  Without that the organisation is Theist, but not Christian.  I have no issue with theism really, but if we’re to call ourselves christian, best we come to grips with what we understand by who Jesus was, is and might be.  Anyway, my use of the word memory caused this guy to wonder, and to wander.  He found it unhelpful because for him the word memory refers to something past and not present.  My response was to wonder with him about how that can be if I’m re-membering in the present.  There’s a peculiar notion of time involved if we think memory means stuck in something past.  When we re-member the event or person from some time back, we are hauling it into today in ways that always reinterpret the original, but make it ever-present.  How I recall something today may not be how I recall it tomorrow which gives rise to some interesting metaphysics – was it the same incident or is it now in my present as something else – my own construction masqerading as memory perhaps?  You see how this might fit with the problem church has with the memory, for us second hand in fact, but first hand in experience, with the person of Jesus, however we interpret him.  Memory is not the past revisited statically at all – but the present coming into conversation with the past so that the linear time distinction is so blurred it doesn’t exist.  Hence the church’s task, maybe it’s sole task, is to re-member Jesus in the constantly evolving present.   Not stuck in the past.  Where many would like him to remain!!  
Posted by in 04:30:17 | Permalink | No Comments »